|
Post by smoothmat on Nov 28, 2011 22:22:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by racegunz on Dec 8, 2011 8:05:29 GMT -5
Look at the weight! over 200 lbs. if I was going to go that heavy I'd use a c-85/c-90, I only know one Sonerai owner, and he repeats the quote often "build it right/build it light" I thought the R-2300 was pretty cool but it is over 185 lbs same as a C-85 basically. Revmaster seems to do alot but if they can't keep it light I don't see the point. Just sayin.
|
|
|
Post by mayday on Dec 9, 2011 2:02:47 GMT -5
Article made it look like they would try to get it certified sometime in the future, although I cant begin to imagine what that would cost. For about the same weight and HP you could use a Corvair for probably 1/4 the cost, unless you are trying to stick with the vw style engine, even so I think the article said they based it off a type 4? Does this not defeat the purpose of the sonerai since fuel consumption would probably double?
|
|
hans
Full Member
Posts: 166
|
Post by hans on Dec 9, 2011 10:22:24 GMT -5
Article made it look like they would try to get it certified sometime in the future, although I cant begin to imagine what that would cost. For about the same weight and HP you could use a Corvair for probably 1/4 the cost, unless you are trying to stick with the vw style engine, even so I think the article said they based it off a type 4? Does this not defeat the purpose of the sonerai since fuel consumption would probably double? it's horses for courses really. If Horvath indeed plans to sell O-200 replacements to the LSA market, comparing his R3000 with a conventional VW based aero engine is pointless. It might look approximately the same, but from the article I gather that it actually is a different animal. As to fuel usage: carburetted engines in about the same RPM range (assuming about the same displacement) can pump only so much air. Assuming near-stochiometric mixtures, fuel useage shouldn't differ as much as you assume... cheers Hans
|
|